FlashStash

Another one... http://www.local6.com/money/2683654/detail.html

Well, the main incident last year was the Wal-Mart woman, but if you remember, it came out later that she's claimed to have been trampled or hurt in about 10 different stores in the past few years. Here's a link to the story... http://edition.cnn.com/2003/LAW/12/12/findlaw.analysis.dorf.lawsuits/index.html

Before you go buying any of the cheap games, I recommend checking out www.gamerankings.com, which summarizes reviews of the games...lots of these cheaper games are (pardon my French) crap! FS

So what you're saying is...is to succeed, TRU should match other people's loss leaders (that's when you sell an item below cost), thereby losing money and this will somehow help them to stay in business?!?!?

I'm glad you understood what I wrote becuase I wasn't even sure *I* did! :)

No, if you're buying items at a loss to them, it is better for them if you don't buy anything. They're not losing money on no sale compared to a sale where they take in less than they paid for the items.

I'm not really sure that corporate is going to care that you're upset with a policy change that will prevent then from losing money on your purchases. C'mon people, get real here.